|
|
Home > Forum, Guestbook & Blog
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Your friendly local necromancer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Te Awamutu, New Zealand
Posts: 100
|
This news story appeared on the wires this morning (http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3719861a11,00.html):
Quote:
- Most psychics involved in missing persons cases say "look near water", because statistically this strategy has a reasonable chance of success. - The Manawatu River would be one of the most obvious places to look for a missing person in Palmerston North. - If the psychic was able to provide such specific information, why didn't they say what had happened to the person or where the body is? - Psychics regularly make calls to the police in regard to these cases. Statistically, every so often a psychic must get it right - just like I would if I made regular guesses. - Most importantly, there's no way to verify any of the claims in this story. How do we know the psychic didn't simply take a walk by the river and spot the clothing, then make a call to police? There are good reasons for doing so, such as gaining credibility with police for herself or psychics in general. Actually, how do we know it was a psychic at all? Maybe it was someone who knew something and wanted to cover their tracks by pretending to be a psychic? As is so often the case, we're left wondering if this is real or not. Being a skeptic I lean towards the simpler explanation that this was just another fraudulent case. I would love to be able to investigate further. |
|
|
|